[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abc / animu / ausneets / fascist / flutter / general / girltalk / mde ]

/leftpol/ - Left Politics

Winner of the 53rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - egenerates

August 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 527913920beaa96⋯.png (225.18 KB, 683x694, 683:694, 2018-08-17 03.14.08.png)

 No.82902

This comrade is right. We need a new definitive leftist web site. This is pretty much a refugee camp for anons disgusted with /leftypol/. And more importantly, if we want to build class conciousness we need to get people out of that tanky shithole and be a more open, debative, heterogenic community.Comrades, when i see a rational debate going on here or in /leftypol/ i get fucking surprised, and thats a problem we all need to solve personally when typing either here, or on a new website.

 No.82905

If something keeps happening again and again and again, then the issue is systemic. A new website will just run into the same problems.

It's time for some personal and ideological introspection, instead of the constant schooling of others (others who do manage to run actual political organizations successfully that is).


 No.82906

No offense, but seriously fuck off already. I happen to like anonymous image boards, I've been shitposting on them longer than some of the newfags on 8ch have been alive at this point, and I'm not about to abandon this place to the right-wing menace to another website even more insular and sheltered.


 No.82907

Do you have any idea how long people had been waiting for a viable alternative to 4chan when gamergate happened? Do you have any idea how many alternative image boards with communities you can count on your hand?


 No.82917

Just keep telling /pol/ fags to fuck off


 No.82918

>>82906

this tbh


 No.82921

Damn looks like i just got owned. At least i can argue with >>82905 neoliberalism is managed succsessfully and countless other systems, that doesnt make them any better than less tried alternative systems. Marxism leninism has been proven time and time again to be shit and like tankies often do you just blind fold to those proofs for the sake of your own conservative authoritharian beliefs


 No.82924

File: 47f720aa68a3ca6⋯.jpg (15.65 KB, 592x352, 37:22, crying-pool-of-tears.jpg)

>>82906

>I've been shitposting on them longer than some of the newfags on 8ch have been alive at this point.

*phew*

Has it really been that long? Tfw people who were born after the creation of 4chan are at drinking legal age.


 No.82928

>>82921

There's little point in being better if that betterment remains confined to telling people how much better you are.


 No.82931

>>82906

>I've been shitposting on them longer than some of the newfags on 8ch have been alive at this point

That's not something to be proud of tbh


 No.82940

I would love a new board, but the previous attempts were half-assed, by community members most people hated, or at a time when /leftypol/ was still fun to browse.


 No.82966

>>82902

the problem is that imageboards are shit but signing up is also a shit waste of time and usually involves forums that aren't ephemeral so it's less easy to have fun shitposting about how jeremy corbyn is going to create a stasi to hunt blairites because you know that post will still be there in a decade.

the other problem is that a new site has the same problem as a new hardware standard. you think you'll consolidate 42 different use-cases into 1 bigger, better, easier and simpler place and what you end up with is 43 different standards.

>>82906

>I'm not about to abandon this place to the right-wing menace

this is like hitler saying he's not going to abandon Berlin to the communist menace circa 1945. Like mate you don't exactly have a choice it's already basically conquered.


 No.82969

>>82966

>this is like hitler saying he's not going to abandon Berlin to the communist menace circa 1945. Like mate you don't exactly have a choice it's already basically conquered.

Light moderation and anonymity means this doesn't really matter. If 8chan were anything like Reddit or Tumblr, this board would've been banned into oblivion and all its shitposters placed on some Twitter-Gestazi-curated unperson list.


 No.82973

>>82969

This places owes its existence to being a haven for people too racist for 4chan. Guess there's something to the horse shoe theory after all.


 No.82978

>>82973

>mocking luggage lad for being a cuck

>racism


 No.83021

>>82969

>all its shitposters placed on some Twitter-Gestazi-curated unperson list.

Leftypol's BO is busy writing it.


 No.83048

File: 88faf3c481073ff⋯.jpg (65.15 KB, 1134x566, 567:283, 416e46320a6cf17763fb33eb43….jpg)

>>82902

Let's think ahead a little with a hypothetical scenario.

>we stay on 8ch

>BO of this board gets to be as bad as Body Odour

>new board created

>exodus

>freedoms, and if we don't have that another board can easily be founded

or

>we leave 8ch

>BO/site owner/whatever gets to be as bad as Body Odour

>uh, fuck

>at a higher skill/entry level, a new site is created, maybe, hopefully

>alternately we get another board to take us in as refugees

>exodus with more attrition from having to go to new site, learn new interface, etc.

>freedoms, and if we don't have that we're back to square one

>>82966

This. If I have to sign up for shit, enable cookies or java or any bullshit like that, I'm out. I'm not here to be polite and as you said I'm sure af not here to give the fuckers in charge any character assassination materiel. Anonymity is essential to honest discourse.

>all is lots DDDD:DD:

No, it's that either /pol/ raidposts aren't being reported or vols aren't doing their jobs.

>>82969

This also.

>>82973

>dat /pol/ narrative

No, there was an exudus before /pol/ and a brief time when the racist shit on this site was the good-natured irreverant ribbing for which cuckchan was known in its heyday. Then /pol/, milopedo and some of the other youtube buttpuppets (Mundane Twat, GWARcum of Mossad) lampreyed onto GG and everything turned to shit.

>>83021

Good thing we have our own /leftypol/ with blackjack and hookers, then.


 No.84389

bump

anyone got any moneyz to get this thing up and running? i know people have donated to richard wolff before well why not a website


 No.84400

>>84389

>why not get a website

why not read the post right above yours?


 No.84410

>>82973

This place really owes its existence to GaymerGate, which is why every third thread some idiot brings it up and starts ranting about how ‘feminism’ and ‘SJWs’ somehow control society. You will find people here who claim to be committed leftists, but will defend the spooked righty idpol dumpster fire that was GG like an ML defending the Norks.


 No.84425

>>84410

Fortunately I never got into GG but to be honest I could never understand what the fuck it was supposed to be about. Whenever I talked to a GGer on the internet I just got treated to a firehose of shit about some girl fucking some guy who wrote about video games or something.

Maybe I'm just getting older but I could not be arsed to give a damn at all about this issue. But I can see it as being a precursor to the sort of firehose mindfuck of reactionary propaganda that'd vomit itself out all over the internet and body politic a short time later.


 No.84448

>>82902

who cares


 No.84473

File: 7126a968d29cccd⋯.jpg (47.37 KB, 311x370, 311:370, personal-political.jpg)

File: 5be9ceefb3addaa⋯.png (361.78 KB, 1502x947, 1502:947, tfw sjws.png)

>>84410

>spooked righty idpol dumpster fire

The point of GG was specifically to get the "left" out of spooked idpol dumpster fires. The fact that didn't entirely work is why "leftists" still don't have their sights on actual politics.


 No.84476

>>84473

>our spooked righty idpol spergout over some woman critiquing the commodification of female sexuality and the prevalence of sexist stereotypes in video games and some other woman fucking a journalist who didn't review her game, followed by aggressively sperging out at some other women who pointed out how stupid this was was all an elaborate plan to somehow combat idpol

Yeah somehow I don't think that adds up.


 No.84482

>>84476

GG was about a clique of goons exerting control over the video game industry. Those were just a couple of things that happened tangentially related to it. Good job just believing what the western capitalist video game marketing media had to say about what was happening.


 No.84486

>>84482

>GG was about a clique of goons exerting control over the video game industry

Which is clearly why if I go on GG forums nowadays they're discussing that and not endlessly shrieking about the stuff I was talking about. Oh wait.

>all that other stuff that happened was only tangentially related

The Zoe Quinn thing was literally the genesis of GG. And and you're right, I forgot about the part where you clueless idiots decided the evil sjw media was colluding to get you and 'push a narrative' because someone wrote a provocative article and other writers covering the same subject decided to, shockingly, write up their own take on it.


 No.84496

>>84486

>Which is clearly why if I go on GG forums nowadays they're discussing that and not endlessly shrieking about the stuff I was talking about. Oh wait.

That's because /pol/yps eventually took over. There was a whole internal conflict over how to deal with them, whether or not to allow them in the threads at all. Because they have turbo autism and paranoid delusions they were much more dedicated than anyone else and dominated the conversation pretty fast.

>The Zoe Quinn thing was literally the genesis of GG.

No it wasn't. People were paying attention to that, but GG started when this happened:

>someone wrote a provocative article and other writers covering the same subject decided to, shockingly, write up their own take on it.

Except you missed the part where all the articles were published together.

You also ignored my point that these people are largely goons, i.e. from the SomethingAwful community and have each others' backs. They're also working as mostly independent marketers for the industry and realized that they have a lot of power when it comes to shaping consumer behavior, which they can use to affect who makes money. There's a very clear class conflict here and you're on the wrong side of it if you call yourself a communist.


 No.84508

File: 0a8efff1f4d1b1d⋯.jpg (43.18 KB, 675x587, 675:587, Deflecting valid criticism.jpg)

>>84476

>sharky was a "critic", not a shitstirring plagiaristic confidence trickster fomenting a 1950s Red Scare Comics Code Authority-style moral panic against an entire medium for personal gain

If you want to go that far back, I'd cite the ME3 debacle as the flashpoint for GG, porky using SJW cocksuckers as ablative shielding for a "piss in my face and tell me it's raining" PR campaign.

>>84496

>Except you missed the part where all the articles were published together.

Oh, hardly just that, articles with the exact same wording, with documented proof of coordination from a secret mailing list in violation of industry regs, all to white knight some secondhand vagina goon clique-ette from a forgettable clickbait-of-the-week story the likes of which (Brad Wardell) had vanished from the public's attention span that same month.

The sheer level of hubris and poor perspective goons have about the stupidest shit, falling on their sword over something so pointless, and refusing to concede an inch over it, is truly flabbergasting.


 No.84550

>>84476

>muh sexism

fuck right off back to reddit

>>84482

>>84496

>muh goons

This narrative is also full of shit.

>>84486

>GG has /pol/ cancer therefore it was always at war with Eurasia /pol/shit

no.

>provacative article

Yeah nice revisionist history. Burgers n Fries traded sex for reviews, and everybody including, surprisingly, Mootles hotpocketed people talking about it, then a bunch of media asspuppets volley-fired articles calling gamers all the insults you've just repeated verbatim. That's what started it. Stop fucking lying about shit like this, on this site of all places.

>>84508

>ME3

Yup, that was a lot of what started the shitshow.


 No.84557

Would anyone here use a private forum if it was invite only? That way you would have to know someone who is a lefty to get in? Somewhat like a private tracker.


 No.84564

>>84557

Speaking for myself and only for myself, nope. If I gotta sign up, sign in, enable cookies or enable javashit, I'm out. Destroying anonymity in the name of security is unnecessary. Short of a full-on shitflood raid (in which case the board can be locked), all it takes is users reporting Master Trole 2018 from r/the_cuckold to the mods, and the mods banning him and anchoring or deleting his threads. And the only way we'll grow as a community is if we're willing to engage with people and their arguments, which a chaperone/reccommendation system would prevent.

If you're talking about in addition to this site I'm leery of that too. Both online and in meatspace the formation of seperate, exclusive cliques within a movement or group has been the deathknell of that movements or groups. /leftypol/'s mods jerking each other off into a frenzy on Discord in April would be a good example of this.


 No.84580

File: 73dba4f51a68b08⋯.png (705.8 KB, 1229x7676, 1229:7676, weird twatter.png)

File: f75d6ddff750bbc⋯.jpg (612.36 KB, 1691x3026, 19:34, SRShistory.jpg)

>>84550

<muh goons

>This narrative is also full of shit.

Every single central figure on the oppo side was a goon, top to bottom. GG was started and maintained by the goon clique brainlessly circling its wagons around one of their own, out of 100% pure tribalism, and they're still the primary factor behind the online arm of today's lib-left. It's in their cultural DNA.

>>84557

NO. IRC circlejerk is what killed /leftypol/ and invited the Twatter tank menace. We need more openness and democracy, not less.


 No.84612

>>84580

I'm not convinced what I observed would be possible without greater collusion than even the most intensely autismic SA circlejerking could account for, but I'd be willing to believe they were part of it. Agree 100% on the Doom That Came to /leftypol/ being something we should take deliberate steps to avoid.


 No.84619

>>84476

>righty idpol spergout

Fuck off idiot, GG was in fact majority left-liberal when it was active.


 No.84624

>>84580

>1st image

stopped reading after 'SJW-dominated media'

>2nd image

>SRS is SJWs who joined SA after being raided by le anonnymoose

>proofs

>Goonswarm is a thing

Yes and that buttfuck nothing to do with this.

>they're doing the same thing on plebbit

>proofs

also

>muh leftist rhetoric

forget where you are m8?

>SRS vs. some random subreddit

Irrelevant and no proofs.

>SRS 'attacked' MRAs somehow with SPLC in some way I won't describe

Benis lol

>HideMyAss dindu nuffin

>Sabu dindu nuffin

8=================D~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

>SRS SWJ goons did Progressive Stack when they hijacked OWS when they 'took over' their social media somehow, because Occupy was a top-down organization with an official social media wing

>also social media is literally the only way Occupy interacted with one another

>here's a screencap of a post from 5 years ago that proves it

take your fucking meds

>SRS did r/creepershots

>proofs

they did that? that's terrifying, it'd take the force of a strong gust of wind to do that!

>cult copypasta meme

>my uncle who worked at Nintendo's division in Northern Ireland during the Troubles saw some shit, but he said it was nothing compared to the boogeyman


 No.84643

File: 24bf27bde983b9e⋯.jpg (63 KB, 1213x362, 1213:362, pol dindu.jpg)

File: b1b451748610e7c⋯.png (504.98 KB, 1085x611, 1085:611, 1533331102610.png)

>>82902

Hey that's me. If anyone is curious what the the post image is; It's a mod showing how someone is also trying to subvert the board by spamming threads with video games that seem to be pushing a liberal/SJW "agenda". The mods don't seem to care anymore now though because they know they can't contain the autism.

On the topic of this thread though, there's some good points that have been made. I don't think we need to migrate for now. But if we do, it's not only going to have to be better than what we have now, but it'll have to be much better otherwise the community will be split yet again. For now it's small boards like /his/ and /lit/. But it would also be cool if we could convince Hiro to make a sister board for /pol/ in the same way there's /v/ and /vg/.


 No.84663

>>84476

You do realize GJP was being used to coordinate industry blacklists, right? Like it's in the leaks if you bothered to read them, got a lot of attention from GG and was why I signed on. People like Alastair Pinsof and Kevin Dent stopped finding work in the industry because they stepped on the wrong toes, Wolf Wozniak actually apologized for publicizing that Zoe Quinn sexually harassed him.

(Also it was coverage, doesn't have to be a review to be a CoI!)


 No.84665

>>84619

>>84624

>>84663

why do people still care about this shit


 No.84671

It's almost 2019 and y'all motherfuckers are STILL arguing over GG. Let's get some things straight once and for all:

1. If you get your information from the Wikipedo article and not deepfreeze.it, you are a fucking sap (KnowYourMeme unironically has a more accurate article). Anita is not some innocent victim who just wanted to analyze sexist video games, pull your head out of your ass.

2. GG was destined for failure the moment it went from uncovering corruption to targeting advertisers, muh consumer revolt, and making Twitter and Reddit accounts and YouTube vids to pwn the sjews.

3. The reason why GG happened the way it did is because corrupt pieces of shit wanted to make a quick buck, end of story. Most of the notable figures involved in GG didn't give a fuck about or even hated video games in the first place, the best examples of this are grade-A opportunists like Milo and Anita. The SJW/anti-SJW bullshit was a facade and plenty of gullible idiots fell for it. Fuck them all.

At this point, your only options are to get over GG and shut the fuck up about it or attempt to succeed where it failed and focus on searching for more evidence of how sleazy and corrupt the entire industry is. I don't care which one you pick, just fucking pick one and stop your autistic screeching about it in unrelated threads.

Now, this whole "we need a new website!" shit, it's getting old pretty fast. Like others have said, even if we make a new imageboard just for us it will be suspect to the same problems that come with any site where there is a clique of faceless moderators who enforce vague rules. Any new website will have to be one where either users have some degree of control over moderation, or moderation simply does not exist the way it does now. This discussion is important and any calls to make a new site or move somewhere else should deal with this first.


 No.84880

>>84665

He who controls the past controls the future, he who controls the present controls the past.


 No.84912

>>84671

>even if we make a new imageboard just for us it will be suspect to the same problems

Now that I think about it, this isn't a really good argument. Seeing leftpol is doing just fine. If it were the case, then why did we even bother creating leftpol if the same thing was going to happen?


 No.84914

>>84912

>doing fine

Rules are ill-defined, troll threads don't get anchored, harmless posts get bluefired. There's crap we could get working a lot better with a onetime investment of effort and time. And we haven't surpassed /leftypol/'s IP count or even come close to it yet and we won't as long as scabs keep posting there.


 No.84923

>>84671

>Any new website will have to be one where either users have some degree of control over moderation, or moderation simply does not exist the way it does now. This discussion is important and any calls to make a new site or move somewhere else should deal with this first.

We've already done that on /netcom/. It's too bad the mods here at leftpol decided to shit on the project instead of promoting it.


 No.84931

>>84923

The project is democratic centralist and thus overtly sectarian. It's non-answer to our problem.


 No.84952

>>84914

>Rules are ill-defined, troll threads don't get anchored

I was talking more so about what happened to leftypol isn't happening here. Moderation is usually shit no matter where you go, but it manages to be fairly decent here.

>bluefired

?

>as long as scabs keep posting there.

Hence why we need to provide a much better alternative.


 No.84967

>>82902

So gangweed is one of us?


 No.85037

>>84912

Is leftpol really doing just fine at the moment? The whole reason why we moved to leftpol in the first place was shit moderation, and there is no guarantee that leftpol will not succumb to the same problems as time goes on. The only way to solve the issue of poor moderation with any certainty is to formulate an alternative.

The simplest solution I can think of is allowing users to elect new moderators and recall bad moderators. This would require pseudonymous accounts to vote and be elected, but I don't see why an imageboard can't have anonymous users (with or without accounts) and pseudonymous users with accounts as well. Maybe in order to avoid popularity contests when electing moderators, pseudonymous accounts can only apply to be a moderator, pass a certain threshold of user votes, and a enter a pool where a user is randomly selected to fill the position after a certain period of time.

This is all just off the top of my head though, for all I know a better solution would be to do away with moderators entirely and let users directly enforce rules, though that poses a whole new set of problems as well. Perhaps moderators still exist but can only accept or reject what users vote to ban, anchor, delete, etc. There are also numerous other issues worth considering: moderation transparency, how users should be banned, how and what rules should be enforced, who owns the site and domain name, where the server is physically located, how the site will be funded, the list goes on. This is no easy task.


 No.85038

>>85037

>no guarantee that leftpol will not succumb to the same problems as time goes on

tbh tho the mods here are based

the only problem with this board is that it's slow

like really fucking slow

like really, really fucking slow


 No.85040

>>85038

The mods here are better, yes, I absolutely agree. I have my problems with them but they have proven to be generally good at what they do. However, the point I am making is that /leftpol/ uses the same system which allows /leftypol/ BO and moderation to to exist. How can you be certain that the mods here will stay this way forever? If we're being honest, you can't, you can only have blind faith that the owner of this board doesn't change their behavior in a negative way for as long as the board continues to exist and be used.

Also, I might as well mention that I personally have not had any issue with the speed of the board. Different strokes for the different folks I guess.


 No.85041

File: 5c9c5470224d757⋯.jpg (112.37 KB, 423x590, 423:590, gay.jpg)

>>85040 (me)

Forgot to change flag, my bad.


 No.85042

>>85040

>How can you be certain that the mods here will stay this way forever?

Because this board was literally founded by people who hated /leftypol/ BO and that's never going to change.


 No.85044

>>85042

>Because this board was literally founded by people who hated /leftypol/ BO

I agree.

>and that's never going to change.

How are you certain of this?

Also, how does knowing any of this show that this board is more or less immune to poor moderation?


 No.85059

>>84931

You can't call it sectarian when there aren't even membership requirements. Anyone can join and vote. There were never requirements that members be Leninist or Anarchist or any other -ist.


 No.85077

why doesn't someone just make a leftychan?


 No.85078

>>85077

need money to host and shit


 No.85080

>>85078

yeah but i'm sure there's some bougie leftist guy who would be willing to make it


 No.85104

>>85080

bruh none of us are rich why do you think we're lefty


 No.85168

>>84952

>moderation is good here

What material guarantee do we have that things will stay that way?

<bluefire

>?

bluefire = friendly fire

>we need a better alternative

how will learning to the minutiae of learing a new site be preferable to this place tho?


 No.85186

>>84671

>Any new website will have to be one where either users have some degree of control over moderation, or moderation simply does not exist the way it does now.

I think we need to have a model figured out before even beginning to set up a site. The whole post-moderation thing needs to start from a clearly and technically described system.

The big problem IMO is site administration, which materially has the power to change the way the site works and just ditch the system for typical moderation. Site architecture comes before the software. Some kind of distributed system is almost certainly necessary, but that requires more development. However, since that's a bigger challenge than just designing the function of a typical site, this could be put off while moving to a better site administrated by someone who's not a shitter.

The question of moderation is how much moderation and how to do it. It's possible to have a site with no moderation whatsoever, but it needs some way to deal with spam and the like. Simple user moderation like reddit's voting system can help ID spam but it's also prone to abuse and can destroy more controversial ideas leading to a circlejerk. So even a little moderation causes problems, but without some measures to avert spam it's basically unusable. How do you avoid these problems or just find a balance here?


 No.85315

Disappointing, but leftypol is actually looking better than leftpol these days. Moderation still shitty, but discussion is far better. How many posts is bitching about other board's mods?

>inb4 s-shut up, go back to safe space


 No.85319

>>85042

>Burgerland was founded on a tax rebellion, they'd never oppress their citizens because they remembwer King George doing it


 No.85331

>>85315

Half of the threads on the first page here are /pol/yps spamming

At least those get anchored if not deleted on leftypol

I mean what's the point of having a thread that says "Marx want's you to suck Jew cock" on the first page?


 No.85430

>>85331

It's better than getting a month ban for disagreeing with the constant autistic screeching about how every man, woman and child in burgerland is an ebil oppressor and how only St. Pootin will save us.


 No.85494

>Suddenly, early in the spring, an alarming thing was discovered. /leftypol/

was secretly frequenting the board by night! The posters were so disturbed

that they could hardly sleep in their stalls. Every night, it was said, he

came creeping in under cover of darkness and performed all kinds of

mischief. Whenever anything went wrong it became usual to attribute it to /leftypol/.


 No.85537

>>83048

>Then /pol/

Was always there.

>milopedo

lol go fuck yourself you fucking cuck, Milo did absolutely nothing wrong. If anything he isn't extreme enough.

>and some of the other youtube buttpuppets (Mundane Twat, GWARcum of Mossad) lampreyed onto GG and everything turned to shit.

They were there from the start. The movement wasn't hindered by them in the least.

>>85430

>implying Americans aren't this bad

>implying the world wouldn't be a better place if America magically disappeared


 No.85613

>>85494

I understood that reference, but it might help if you told us whose argument you were strawmanning it with. Also why'd you break up part of a novel into prose-like lines?

>>85537

>/pol/ invented the aeroplane goobergape

Proofs or fuck off

>milopedo a gud boi pedos dindu nuffin

Fuck off pedo.

>youtube buttpuppets were always at war with Eastasia there

No they weren't. There were a few months before they lampreyed onto the movement, and a few weeks after that where they weren't fully trusted and some of them were purged (remember MundaneTwatt or whoever it was wanting to sell GG tshirts?).

>my greentext means burgers are the superdevil

The fact that you think that's an argument makes you a massive retard.

>magically disappeared

Well when you can prove such magic exists, I'll gaf. Also if you think that'd be such a good timeline you should post a map or blurb of what you think things'd be like 10, 60 or 100 years after that happened. People have done similar crap, search 'ISOT' on alternatehistory.com deviantart or searx.me and you'll see what I mean.

t. althistfag


 No.86093

>>85613

>Fuck off pedo.

"waaaaaah stop questioning my zero-evidence moral panic waaaaaaah" The day of the helicopter is coming for you soon. Like Trotsky said, if you can't convince a busybody to see the facts, acquaint their head with the pavement at terminal velocity.

>There were a few months before they lampreyed onto the movement, and a few weeks after that where they weren't fully trusted and some of them were purged (remember MundaneTwatt or whoever it was wanting to sell GG tshirts?).

Remember how InternetAristocrat's video was the first exposure most people had to GG?

>Also if you think that'd be such a good timeline you should post a map or blurb of what you think things'd be like 10, 60 or 100 years after that happened.

You'd be gone, either directly by falling into the void if you're American, or indirectly by uncucked men in your own country shooting you once americuck military forces aren't around to back up your shit. Any timeline without you would be great.


 No.86094

>>86093

>The day of the helicopter is coming for you soon.

<When you forget you're on a leftist board and are supposed to say wall instead of helicopter

gtfo pedo back to >>>/liberty/


 No.86098

File: 285a6024fee3cbf⋯.jpg (25.28 KB, 463x424, 463:424, 285a6024fee3cbf80b3c5ebefa….jpg)

>>86093

>muh hellicopters

>but what if the child consents tho???

like pottery

>Remember how InternetAristocrat's video was the first exposure most people had to GG?

no

>any timeline without you would be great

kys and reincarnate in a new one I guess then


 No.86104

>>86094

>tfw all you have to contribute to the board is idpol…


 No.86602

>>86094

I'll say whatever the fuck I want. GTFO back to reddit you feminist faggot.

>>86096

>someone who knows enough to give consent to other teens is magically somehow unable to have this knowledge if their partner is older

>someone old enough to be criminally charged as an adult is a child

Fuck outta here. Teens aren't children. You are, though. Also, the pic you posted is hella fucking retarded. Everything written in the lower right corner is irrefutably correct. Putting arguments you can't refute in a meme picture doesn't make them wrong.

>no

Ah, so you weren't actually around when GG started and are just making shit up. As if anyone had ever expected anything else.


 No.86606


 No.86689

>>82906

>I'm not about to abandon this place to the right-wing menace

Here we go.

No offense intended but 8chan is what it is, you and anybody fool enough to ram against a nazi wall deserve counseling.


 No.86691

>>86602

>blah blah blah I have to post my aspergic pedoshit on every thread because I'm a faggot who doesn't know when he's not wanted

we know

>you weren't there when gg started because you're going against the narrative I have no evidence of

piss off


 No.86692

>>86689

>it is what it is lol XD

>don't continue to piss off and make fools of the wannabe-nazis on their own site, go to some other site so we can DDOS it or shut it down

benus


 No.86695

>>86691

>I have to post my aspergic pedoshit on every thread because I'm a faggot who doesn't know when he's not wanted

Imagine having the self-awareness to type this, yet still doing it.


 No.86698

>>86691

I don't give a single fuck if you want me here or not. Partly I do this to piss cucks like you off since you're feminist cancer that refuses to be reasoned with and deserves to be lined up and shot, and I intend to make things as difficult and frustrating for you as possible.

>>86695

Imagine not having the reading comprehension necessary to realize that I'm not the person who typed that post.


 No.86699

>>86698

If you didn't type >>86691 then why, exactly, did you reply?


 No.86708

>>86698

>I don't care if you want me here or not yet actively care that I piss you off

>if you don't want to fuck little girls you want to watch other guys fuck your wife

benis lol XD


 No.86712

>>86695

>n-no u

neck yourself pedo


 No.86715

>>86712

>sexual orientation is whether someone points out that I'm a dumbass or not.


 No.87012

>>85494

change that to idpol and it be more accurate




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abc / animu / ausneets / fascist / flutter / general / girltalk / mde ]