Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
I wish people would understand the difference between implicit and explicit racism and also how structural racism actually works.
The government already does all it can inside its limits, it's like people want the government to do something magic like using some remote controlled device that can mind control and brainwash people out of their dumb prejudiced notions.
>a few grumbles because people think mentioning MLK is baiting
>video has 112 dislikes anyway
Yeah we totally needed a thread on this eh op?
>limits of legal reform within capitalism
They don’t care about that. All they want is to bolster black women and make life worse for males. They idiotically pile Bernie in their narrow minded interpretation of white guys.
It's time to redact voting rights for women
Black women are the source of miscegenation
Shit, I wish people would learn the difference between discrimination and women paying more for a product because it costs more money to print pretty pink flowers on it.
She the people is a porky front group and their interest in idpol serves their class interests. "Black women" aren't a monolith and Sanders' policies would help the overwhelming majority of them, just not the richfags he was naive enough to give a speech to thinking they were real activists.
Malcom X literally believed that white people were created by an ancient evil scientist 6600 years ago
They were though.
Islam is always right, Allah is love
Black women do not dislike Sanders overall. It's insider black women who get platformed to shittalk him. Like when the DNC polled black women in their organization and passed it off as the general opinion. IIRC he polls better with black women than Kamala Harris.
This is unfortunately true
How does 'structural racism' actually work?
Why can it be called 'racism'?
>in the SJW sense
All hierarchy, establishments, government, legal regimes, economic entities, other power structures, and factually objective conceptualizations of physical reality, are inherently huwite supremacist.
Racism can only be enforceably legislated against to the extent it conflicts with or does not coincide with the current mode of production. This means open policies of explicit racism such as slavery, apartheid, redlining, and employment discrimination can be and have been successfully eliminated by legal reform.
The mode of production, in our case capitalism, inherently imposes legal conditions it needs in order to function. In the case of capitalism, that is the need for individuals to be put in positions of unchecked, arbitrary power, with the explicit economic obligation to hurt other people, for any (or no!) implicit personal motivation. When a boss unjustly fires or refuses to hire you, is it because they're racist, because they're an asshole? When a banker refuses you a mortgage, or a landlord refuses you housing, is it because they're racist, or because they're an asshole? Answering such questions of thoughtcrime, in order to ferret out the implicit racists, and leaving only the race-blind "honest" explicit capitalist assholes, is the impossible fool's errand of post-1960s "race activists".
This is why socialism is the only answer, because only by eliminating the camouflage capitalism provides for implicit racism, can material oppression through which racists cause harm be explicitly eliminated, and the question of who is racist rendered practically irrelevant.
Liberals fighting each other is good, hopefully they drive every prole away from them.
We need this in clip form immediately. What town hall video can I find this on?
>She the People
what the fuck is this?
yet another front for the bourgeoisie using "Activist Marketing" as a way to push their agenda.
Feminists and their SJW "Allies" have become absorbed into the system and are nothing but the useful idiots of capital.
Women trying to play politics and acting like children as usual
Didn't he renounced black nazism after his travel to mecca?
>hierarchy is good
>calling anyone else a liberal
The superior in intellect, strength and experience should rule the inferior. To say anything else is madness. The individual mind is the driving force of history and history is made by minorities. The dead weight of the masses than Marxists worship is a lie. When did the masses ever choose a good leader? When did the masses produce works of art, great plans, new technology? All the products of superior individuals
5 minutes on this board and it's already an overdose of idealism.
It's Marxist feminism
A collective of women in their periods
Well long story short, black women created incels
>Involving women in politics.
While I find great value with your post, I feel you haven't quite answered my questions. Let me be more explicit: What is 'structural racism'? Is it a fair or accurate use of language to refer to this phenomenon as 'racism'?
All anons supporting Bernie "bomb Yugoslavia and side with imperialism" Sanders should either declare themselves to be liberals or take a serious look at themselves and renounce politics because this guy is definitely not a socialist and is infact an ardent defender of capitalism.
I think he was worth supporting in 2016 to rehabilitate the word socialism, but he's served his purpose now and has done a lot of bad things since then.
>What is 'structural racism'?
Like I said, depending on who you ask.
>Is it a[n] accurate use of language?
>Is it […] fair […] to refer to this phenomenon as 'racism'?
Not in any but the narrowest sense, seeing as how the loopholes capitalism necessitates for "implicit" racism are responsible for so many other noisome things that otherwise could've been stamped out or rendered nonissues.
Still, from a pragmatic rhetorical standpoint, if used cautiously, it's a reasonable enough conception of deprogramming shitlibs.
>has all the actually faulty or tactically unwise political positions of burning sandals from which to choose (failing to pursue electoral fraud, kowtowing to sjw gibberish like the wage gap, pushing russiagate hysteria, etc.) for the purpose of expressing distaste
>opts for defending genocidal fascism
Socialism is literally all about tearing up top-down hierarchies tho.
Read a book fren.
You are so correct. It's time for the American political left unite around a sensible candidate who will rebuff the Russian menace, like Joe Biden or Pete Buttigieg.
>wait, pete who?
>oh, it's the dnc "ex"-spook
>seems he's coined a political term for himself
This sounds like the name of a subreddit
But socialism is rehabilitated now so we can go back to being politically irrelevant.
Actually I was thinking more like a genuinely principled socialist like Howie Hawkins.
>green new meme platform
He's better than anyone else running but he will never do enough.
fuck off third world nigger
If you actual read his platform it's actually quite radical. He wants to abolish the Senate for starters. Green Party Green New Deal =/= that watered down Keynesian bill drafted by Ocasio-Cortez et al.
>amerimutt calling others third world niggers
>I can magically tell people's nationality over standard TCP-IP
>the person I disagree with is the boogieman btw
mods got angry. this place IS leftypol
here comes the new boss, same as the old boss.
>thinks shitposting about niggers, cucks, and jews is the same thing as political discussion
>everything I don’t like is shitposting
This board is as rulecucked as /leftypol/, the only difference being that mods are as slow as shit here. It’s hilarious how this sites fascist boards are more tolerant than /leftypol/ and this board which is literally ran by a Jew in an attempt to drive real leftists into a honeypot site
Che bans 56% memes though
>so much for the tollerant left
Do you retards even know the difference between shitposting and actual discussion?
I guess that's a no then.
>mods deleting one shitpost about muh ebul womyn is equivalent to mods wordfiltering a region putting demcon into practice and banning anybody who defends them or criticizes certain heads of state
Protip: if you ban people for criticizing someone, you are definitively not "critically" supporting him.
well I guess that's reassuring
if you can't take bants, don't be online
they're obviously being so. Dr. Asperger was the origin of the term "weaponized autism" and since he served under le ebil nahtzees he's bad.
it doesn't matter, support for mods is a new form of cuckery.
Why would that be reassuring? I thought you were a Jim Profiter who liked bantz J Barg
>I'll repeat things over and over like a /pol/goblin and hopefully somebody will agree with me
>if not I can always samefag
did they delete anything other than this? Will mash f5 like a chimp after posting this so I'll be able to read your posts before they get ganked hopefully.
>/pol/ is the board of peace and tolerance
suck the corn from my shit tbh
did the new boss ban your Nazbol flag?
Polite reminder that 'rulecuck' is a legitimate criticism, while 'cuck' is a generic put-down that's worn down from overuse. Otherwise agree with you
We're getting closer to them in that the tankie infestation is getting more annoying.
>anybody sick of my shit is triggered
scorching-hot take bro
>why do they persecute me so?
B E N I S
Based! Fuck anti-egalitarian Gender Idpolers! #FeelTheBern2020
I like bantz I hate mods
Besides I prefer bait to bantz. Anything to get people aggravated.
All of this is irrelevant. Tl;dr
>my programming can't interpret this so I'll say it's tl;dr
Towards the end of his life he was basically a ml.