[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / leftpol / miku ]

/leftpol/ - Left Politics

Winner of the 81rd Attention-Hungry Games
/y2k/ - 2000s Nostalgia

Entries for the 2019 Summer Infinity Cup are now open!
May 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: dd59ea7b3d0e85e⋯.jpg (472.45 KB, 971x1500, 971:1500, 1630 Reza Abbasi - Two Lov….jpg)

 No.137834

I'm banned from leftypol, so here goes.

According to the History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps episodes on Islam and Gender, in Islam, traditionally if the man does not sexually satisfy his wife, she can sue. A muslim man may have many wives, and he has them virtually as slaves.

I do not justify the system but there is something to be learned here. After all, a feminist woman can be made traditional if she is just fucked right. It is on men to be men enough to do so.

Women need an anchor, this will either be a man or a large group of friends, they will either be women or gay men. But a woman cannot reproduce with women or gay men. So when men are not strong and stable they fail society in a way that's not true for women.

 No.137836

Males are naturally polygynous by nature, while the woman’s reproductive needs are satisfied by a single man. This is why polygyny of the most fit elements of society is the way forward in the future. With sterilized unfit elements there will be a surplus of women, all of whom will be impregnated by the polygynous chads


 No.137837

Gender is reactionary.


 No.137838

>>137837

Go take your estrogen, piggy


 No.137840

What does this have to do with communism?


 No.137841

This is mega cringe. Why don't you try /pol/ instead?


 No.137842

>>137841

t. Mom


 No.137844

>>137841

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot to clarify. There was post on leftypol about women and communism and I figured this was relevant.


 No.137848

>>137834

>man demands women to willingly give up rights while on the same time taking more duties

>he thinks he can achieve this by "fucking her right"

You /pol/yps never cease to amuse me


 No.137850

> After all, a feminist woman can be made traditional if she is just fucked right

lmao do you actually believe this?


 No.137851

>>137850

I've seen it happen more than once. If her end of the deal satisfies her, then yes. Though perhaps I'm making a hasty generalization.

It is common knowledge, often expressed as a prejudice, for example, in Australia or in Latin America.

It is not a surrender of rights if it is voluntary. She is not being forced into slavery. The second you no longer satisfy her she can jet, she'll probably be shrill while she's at it and maybe the man will be creepy about it.


 No.137852

File: 3d92a078a1a19db⋯.png (300.21 KB, 1420x1299, 1420:1299, 1518326786659.png)

>>137834

this anon be like


 No.137961

File: 25ff74e4ebe4461⋯.jpg (109.8 KB, 620x387, 620:387, Savile_2985561b-1.jpg)

>>137834

>muslim man may have many wives, and he has them virtually as slaves.

>I do not justify the system but there is something to be learned here.

If you were to be born into a society without knowing what gender you were going to be, would you be arguing for female slavery?

Suppose you were a fourteen year old and the slave of some pedo.

Not so bad if it's David Bowie.

Not so great if it's Jimmy Savile:

"Savile got up and moved off to stand in a shaded corner by the top of the stairs. The shorts, which were shorter than I first feared, were becoming alarmingly translucent thanks to the sun pouring through a porthole behind him. I really did not want to see an outline of what lay beneath.

This ensemble was completed by white towelling sports socks pulled up to the lower calf and a green knotted handkerchief on his head. It was like a Chapman brothers ' reimagining of a postcard caricature from the golden days of the British seaside. "

-Dan Davis, In Plain Sight:The Life and Lies of Jimmy Savile

Redist doesn't incl. include romantic partners: https://youtu.be/falpX1HYLSo


 No.137968

women should be entitled to nothing but beatings. a feminist woman is made traditional through beatings. nothing else.


 No.137978

>>137968

This. Beatings are actually good for women. They are naturally child-like and only violence makes them snap out of it (briefly) and see reason


 No.137988

>>137978

did your daddy hurt you as a little boy? Did he come home drunk and mommy would tell you to hide?


 No.137990

>>137988

Behold the leftist in his prime. Only able to mock and act emotional, never able to debunk.

Women are oversized children and require the same discipline as children do. In the past we knew this but sadly we have forgotten


 No.138010

File: 0fa2dbd385bd879⋯.jpg (174.71 KB, 514x536, 257:268, super spooky.jpg)

>>137834

>>137836

>>137968

Men and women aren't as different as you think they are. Most noticeable gender differences are socialized. The biological ones barely matter if they matter at all when it comes to social policy and mores.


 No.138011

>>138010

Nice assertions, spookfag


 No.138013

File: 7a84a8b76eec333⋯.png (268.71 KB, 1200x1335, 80:89, (you).png)

>>138010

>~200,000 years of Homo Sapiens as an anatomically-distinct species has had no serious impact on human behaviour


 No.138014

>>137990

What's to debunk? You just made a stupid assertion without anything to back it up, the audacity of this nigger i swear…


 No.138022

>>138013

The impact of gender on behavior, has mostly to do with sexuality.

https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2005-11115-001.html


 No.138053

>>138011

>learned behavior is biologically innate

>>138013

Men and women are the same species, you retard.


 No.138055

>>137850

"Fucked right" is a cringy way of phrasing it, but feminist women absolutely drop their supposed values when they're sufficiently pampered and coddled by a man, even one that embodies the "toxic masculinity" boogieman they cry about.

>>138010

Bullshit, humans have self-evidently innate compulsions that vary by gender.


 No.138058

>>138055

>I think the word "most" means "all"


 No.138143

File: d22f31e902bcdb8⋯.jpg (61.84 KB, 466x270, 233:135, _46639665_stake_gettycr_46….jpg)

>>138014

asking for burden of proof is what got the 17th century revolutions in both Europe and the new world rolling forward


 No.138144

>>138010

how? I'm a bio-essentialist. ahistorical interpretations of female behavior throughout history has wrought consequences since women were born of two, Lilith and Eve, but man only one, Adam. most Stirnerites (Junger aside) can't into the esoteric because they think consciousness and existence are the same thing, ergo "I think therefore I am". not to say Rene Descartes had a load of bad ideas, but the interpretation of the anarch still boils down to two separate entities who act according to their pre-determined sins. some may say women are more oppressed than men due to their bearing of two sins but that's because if God nor Satan can produce a woman who isn't fucked up in one way or another who is to say man himself through the force of technology can do the same as a mere mortal? almost every fuckup in history was because of women down to the fact men fought for the attainment of women or to protect them. they alone cannot do this because they tried that with feminism. and its had disastrous results. hence, women, are children.


 No.138158

>>138144

I'm not reading this block of shit but anybody who uses the Old Testament to do philosophy should be shot.


 No.138192


 No.138196

File: 52e9c3609be1ebe⋯.jpg (222.46 KB, 670x588, 335:294, 8761966989.jpg)

>>138144

>Using the Bible to assert anything about biology

>almost every fuckup in history was because of women down to the fact men fought for the attainment of women or to protect them

>it's women fault if men are thinking with their dick


 No.138486

>>138158

>>138196

as opposed to science which is nothing more than calculated experiments that in the modern era are managed by peer groups which all have their own agenda to push because there is no such thing as a person without an opinion. but go ahead, shoot me.

>almost every fuckup in history was because of women down to the fact men fought for the attainment of women or to protect them

>it's women fault if men are thinking with their dick

non-argument, technology is why the world revolves around vagina. back in the day muh dik or not you wanted to get revenge there was no red tape or bureaucracy or dumb laws about war crimes and shit so you can suck my cock and so can the horse you rode in on.


 No.138552

>>137837

This board has been invaded by trannies lmao


 No.138761

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139215

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139307

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139634

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / leftpol / miku ]