[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / leftpol / miku ]

/leftpol/ - Left Politics

Winner of the 81rd Attention-Hungry Games
/y2k/ - 2000s Nostalgia

Entries for the 2019 Summer Infinity Cup are now open!
May 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 02bec444def19a6⋯.jpg (63.31 KB, 900x750, 6:5, ludwig-wittgenstein-2.jpg)

 No.136950

Is it possible to make an argument in favour of an ideology that doesn't already contain said ideology's underlying assumptions as an a-priori?

 No.136957

Who gives a shit


 No.136977

What are an 'ideology's underlying assumptions'?

Seems to me that a good way to argue in favour of an ideology would be to argue for things it might follow from.


 No.136983

Ethical Solipsism doesn't have any antecedents, so I just went ahead band did it myself


 No.136993

>>136977

An example would be the anarcho-capitalist argument that anarcho-capitalism stems from the recognition fundamental human right of self-ownership, with this right of self-ownership itself being a tenet of anarcho-capitalism.


 No.137115

>>136950

>Is it possible to make an argument in favour of an ideology that doesn't already contain said ideology's underlying assumptions as an a-priori?

Not right off the bat it isn't. But as Ben Burgis seems to suggest in this video. you can examine the underlying assumptions as you go. (I'm not Ben Burgis) https://youtu.be/BIB6_4s1ET0 second half of vid contains the meat


 No.137117

>>136950

Sure. Argue that adopting the ideology is instrumental for some purpose rather than that it's true.


 No.137258

>>136950

>Is it possible to arrive at a place from one direction without also arriving at it from all other directions?


 No.137268

Is it possible to not be cucked by positivism?


 No.138803

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.138970

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139163

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139693

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES


 No.139713

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / leftpol / miku ]